Hi Jeff,
We’ve been together almost since you started practicing law, so I know I can ask you anything informally. Our office has learned so much from you for so long, that we just have to say how grateful we are. Thank you from all of us.
But I wanted to ask this one through your online “Jeff’s On Call!” column so everyone could benefit from your wisdom.
Here’s some background and my question:
We are running into more and more situations where the client claims they know the person because they have the resume in their database. As we all know, having a resume and having a candidate are two very different things.
Our recruiters always check with the candidate to make sure they have not sent their resume or contacted the client already. But with the new “robots” that submit a candidate’s resume all over the place, they sometimes do not remember (or even know) where their resume has been blasted.
It’s very disheartening to go through the whole process of interviewing the candidate, rolling out the position, and then having some human resources rep tell you, “We already have their resume.” We have now allowed them to access their database, and helped them identify a viable candidate for free!
I realize we get paid for delivering the candidate, but with some of these new “point and click” robots, maybe we need to change our SOP.
What say you? What you say, we follow.
Thanks as always for being there when we need you!
Sincerely,
Al Alan C. Born General Manager Electronic Search, Inc.
Hi Al,
I’m delighted to address this daily recruiter reply.
It’s inevitable when you submit a runaway resume. That’s an “open resume” with contact information or too much background identification.
If rushing out a resume alone could get you paid, I’d still be working a desk. I would have spent those 40 placement lawyer years perfecting the ultimate electronic resume delivery system.
There is no “First in time, first in right” law when it comes to candidate referrals (including through direct candidate replies). However, it can be created by contract when the parties agree. This usually happens either through an employer’s PSA (placement service agreement) or by some communication from the employer placing the recruiter on notice of a resume “first in” policy. (Signing the PSA is an expressed acceptance, referring when on notice is an implied acceptance.)
Apparently there was neither a PSA nor a notice from the employer here.
So general causation principles apply. Did you cause the hire? If the only defense is an undisclosed “first in” policy, it sounds like the employer acted on your referral – the resume. You’ll need to be absolutely sure. Once you are, you can determine whether the employer is contractually liable.
Now, let’s discuss how runaway resumes invite fee avoidance. Chronologically, the typical sendout process looks like this:
800×600
Normal
0
false
false
false
EN-US
X-NONE
X-NONE
MicrosoftInternetExplorer4
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-parent:””;
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:”Times New Roman”,”serif”;}
That’s why so many recruiters don’t get their well-earned fees. They (5) “Identify candidate” before they (6) “Get client response”. It’s “Ready, fire, aim!” so they shoot their five-figure fee foot.
By simply reversing items 5 and 6, “Present candidate” is followed by “Get client response” (always positive, or you never get to) “Identify candidate.”
Paid recruiters use the client clincher as a wedge when they have the highest leverage. That is after you have a positive response but before you’ve identified a candidate. You obtain interest and then write (by email or fax) the client clincher. More on this after we set up the sendout process properly.
Your question concerns a referral by resume. Legally, it’s the same as calling the client. In either case, a presentation. Fine. But you absolutely do not identify the candidate at that time.
Let’s do each type of presentation the right way:
You always send a “blind” resume by email, fax or regular mail. That means on every resume, you delete the name, address, phone, fax and email address of the candidate. You also delete the current employer and any other identifying items on the resume. Then code the resume with a reference number.
Include the following statement at the top of the resume:
This candidate is being presented by (name of your business) for a suitable job opening with your company. Please contact (your name at your phone numbers) or (your email address) should you wish to discuss the candidate further or arrange an interview. Thank you.
Then when the client calls back, the conversation goes like this:
Hirem: Hi, Al! What’s the name of candidate CR-2304?
Al: Hi, Hirem! I’m going to email you his name along with his contact information as soon as we’re through discussing his background.
Hirem: Okay, but what if we’re already considering him?
Al: If you are, he doesn’t know it. But why don’t we agree that you’ll email me the date of any prior contact and with whom within one business day from receipt of the resume? Fair enough?
Hirem: Don’t you trust me?
Al: Absolutely! That’s why I’ll reveal the identity and contact information so you can verify he’s not in the pipeline.
Hirem: Fine. What’s his background?
When you’re presenting a candidate by phone, the conversation is almost the same:
Al: Hi, Hirem! I’d like to discuss the background of a candidate we just recruited for the (name of position) opening.
Hirem: Hi, Al! Great – what’s his name?
Al: I’m going to email you his name along with his contact information on his resume as soon as we’ve established mutual interest.
Hirem: Okay, but what if we’re already considering him?
Al: If you are, he doesn’t know it. But why don’t we agree that you’ll email me the date of any prior contact and with whom within one business day from receipt of the resume? Fair enough?
Hirem: Don’t you trust me?
Al: Absolutely! That’s why I’ll reveal the identity and contact information so you can verify he’s not in the pipeline.
Hirem: Fine. What’s his background?
Then you send the “open” resume as an email (or fax) attachment. In the body of the email (or fax cover sheet), you include the client clincher:
As we agreed by phone today, the attached resume is being sent to you with the understanding that you will notify me by a return email within one business day from today if (name of candidate) has already been contacted by (name of client) about the (name of position) opening. This will include the date of any prior contact, and the name and title of the (name of client) employee who contacted him.
If I don’t receive the notification, a placement fee will be due to (name of your) business in the event (name of client) hires (name of candidate) within one year from the date of our last communication regarding him.
I know this sounds tough, but truly you’re not dealing with a “client.” You’re dealing with a complete stranger – particularly if you’re “running with a MPC” (cold-calling with a most placeable candidate). If it’s an employer that you trust, you can soften the wording.
The important thing is:
You don’t reveal identity and contact information on a candidate until you have the prior contact promise in writing.
That will be fulfilling your promise to yourself:
No more runaway resumes.
Just to be sure you get all of this:
May you client clinch every candidate referral that causes a hire!
Best always,
Jeff
Hi Jeff,
We’ve been together almost since you started practicing law, so I know I can ask you anything informally. Our office has learned so much from you for so long, that we just have to say how grateful we are. Thank you from all of us.
But I wanted to ask this one through your online “Jeff’s On Call!” column so everyone could benefit from your wisdom.
Here’s some background and my question:
We are running into more and more situations where the client claims they know the person because they have the resume in their database. As we all know, having a resume and having a candidate are two very different things.
Our recruiters always check with the candidate to make sure they have not sent their resume or contacted the client already. But with the new ?robots? that submit a candidate?s resume all over the place, they sometimes do not remember (or even know) where their resume has been blasted.
It’s very disheartening to go through the whole process of interviewing the candidate, rolling out the position, and then having some human resources rep tell you, ?We already have their resume.? We have now allowed them to access their database, and helped them identify a viable candidate for free!
I realize we get paid for delivering the candidate, but with some of these new ?point and click? robots, maybe we need to change our SOP.
What say you? What you say, we follow.
Thanks as always for being there when we need you!
Sincerely,
Al
Alan C. Born
General Manager
Electronic Search, Inc.
Normal
0
false
false
false
EN-US
X-NONE
X-NONE
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-parent:””;
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:”Calibri”,”sans-serif”;
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;}
