Seyfarth Synopsis: The temperature may be heating up in the nation’s capital, but Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is keeping things cool. ICE Acting Director, Matthew Albence, confirmed that almost 3,330 Notices of Inspection (NOI) have already been served, across the 50 states and Puerto Rico, initiating Form I-9 audits for companies of all shapes and sizes. It is expected that over 5,000 NOIs will be issued before this latest ICE blitz is over. With the current enforcement climate, there may even be a resurgence of pre-dawn enforcement actions – otherwise known as “raids” – to surprise both workers and their employers.
Companies should expect penalties to climb sky high, with recent reports of multi-million dollar fines, especially for non-compliant electronic I-9 systems — that’s right, something that has nothing to do with unlawful workers.
A NOI initiates a government administrative inspection of a company’s Forms I-9 to determine whether they are complying with existing law. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) leadership considers civil administrative audits to be just one of many tools that ICE can use to reduce the demand for unauthorized unemployment and to protect opportunities for U.S. workers. The current enforcement strategy includes an expanded use of civil penalties, employer audits, and debarment, as well as the criminal prosecution of employers who knowingly break the law.
An ICE audit begins when an auditor and/or an ICE agent arrives at the client’s doorstep to serve the NOI:
HSI leadership has been instructed to continue increasing the number of inspections; it is expected that many companies will receive these government subpoenas during the next week or so. Historically, ICE has prioritized investigations involving critical infrastructure and traditionally targeted industries – including the service industry, restaurants and hospitality, construction, brick and mortar retailers, production and packaging, landscaping, maintenance, and manufacturing.
The majority of NOIs are driven by tips and leads. We have several companies that have received multiple NOIs, at different worksites, across state lines. It’s possible this is purely a coincidence, or it could be proof of a more coordinated effort between the 26 local offices, or Special Agents in Charge (SACs) as they are called, than we have seen in the past. It’s too early to tell.
Receipt of a NOI should be taken very seriously, regardless of the size of the company. If you receive one, it is critical that you act immediately. The law requires employers to provide ICE with the Forms I-9 for each active employee (and for employees terminated within the retention period) within three days of being served the NOI. Failing to timely complete, or doing a sloppy job of completing an I-9 for employees can result in fines of $230 – $2,292 for each and employing undocumented worker can cost companies a steep $573 – $22,927 per employee.
Under no circumstances should a company waive the three days that they are afforded to submit the Forms I-9. During that time, missing Forms I-9 will need to be located, and/or completed when necessary. Documents such as employee lists, payroll, E-Verify and SS no-match information, business entity and staffing agency/contractor information, will need to be collected, in addition to the Forms I-9. The submission should be neatly organized for the government. Working with experienced counsel can simplify a stressful time.
Be proactive and address gaps in immigration compliance. Following are some of the practices that will ensure just that:
Internal assessment, I-9 audits, and remediation. The Form I-9 is often referred to as “the most complicated 3-page form in America.” Companies should consider an internal I-9 audit under the direction of experienced counsel. Before deciding to take on a full audit, however, companies should look at alternatives such as an internal assessment of policies and processes, in conjunction with a sampling of I-9s and E-Verify hygiene, where applicable. Such a project may be more appropriate and cost effective. Then, companies can decide if a full I-9 review or broader cross section is necessary. Either way, the timely remediation of any issues discovered on I-9s is critical. These include, but are not limited to, simple paperwork violations, missing I-9s, expired work authorizations, and fraudulent documents. Acting on the results is key, and the more serious issues should be addressed as quickly as possible. Being proactive will reduce fines and penalties and will also establish a good faith defense in the event of an ICE audit.
Review/Establish policies and procedures. Management cannot turn a blind eye to what is happening in the field, and should insist upon compliant practices. Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell-based immigration policies are something ICE appears to be interested in targeting. Companies should look at their pre-hire applications, I-9 retention schedules, photocopying policies, Social Security (SS) number-related “mismatch” issues (they are back!), reverification policies and practices, and other relevant processes to ensure compliance with the law. From an anti-discrimination perspective, these policies and processes should be implemented consistently.
Conduct due diligence. Whether in the context of a merger, acquisition, or restructuring, understanding the current state of compliance is important:
Be proactive. Do not ignore government notifications including SS no-match letters, Affordable Care Act health insurance notices, and other unconventional no-match notifications (such as unemployment claims of employees not working at your company), or potential identity theft issues. Do not ignore existing liability on the books, including individuals whose I-9s indicate that they are unauthorized to work. Consider the use of E-Verify and other government recommended best practices. Review IMAGE best practices and consider attending an HSI IMAGE training. This program has recently been revamped and is currently offering companies immunity to fines in exchange for joining the program. IMAGE is not for every company and the decision to engage with the government should be considered carefully with counsel. Here are a few quick fixes to reduce exposure:
Invest in ongoing training. While tight policies and procedures can reduce errors, the churn of HR personnel, combined with ongoing updates to United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) guidance, make reinforcement of ongoing training, job aids, and in-house subject matter expertise critical. Aside from imparting technical knowledge, training should highlight the importance of the Form I-9 and the need to take the process seriously. Companies should review free government related online resources and organize an accessible library for their I-9 Administrators while also keeping that space up to date.
Prepare for a government visit. Companies should prepare for a knock at the door by the government. Regardless of industry or company size, this is an event for which every company should have a plan.
This Management Alert appeared first on Seyfarth’s Big Immigration Law Blog.
