Advertisement
10 Key Principles For the Majority of Us Who Need Cultural Change
Get articles like this
in your inbox
The longest running and most trusted source of information serving talent acquisition professionals.
Advertisement
I wrote a popular TLNT article about how 96 percent of respondents from a Strategy&/Katzenbach Center survey on culture and change management highlighted that culture change was needed in their organization in some form.
I criticized some of the over-simplified recommendations that accompanied the survey release, but The Katzenbach Center came through with their recent high quality article and related video on 10 Principles for Leading Change Management.
All leaders need to understand these principles, and it doesn’t matter if you are in a big corporation like General Motors or a small business on Main Street.
Culture is a complex topic that impacts every major change effort. The critical elements of change efforts are cultural and learned so it’s important to learn from experts in this field to increase your effectiveness.
It’s an extensive article that may seem overwhelming to some, so I’ll bottom line the 10 Principles and clarify some aspects to help leaders in any size organization relate.
They initially highlighted three (3) major hurdles to overcome with change management:
They emphasized the need for leaders to “make the most of their company’s existing culture. Instead of trying to change the culture itself, they draw emotional energy from it.” Leaders should “look for the elements of culture that are aligned to the change, bring them to the foreground, and attract attention of the people who will be affected by the change.”
This advice is consistent with culture expert Edgar Schein’s insights to start with a business problem and to understand “there are always parts of the culture that help you solve the problem or hinder you.” Leaders must realize they are undermining their change effort from the very start if they over-emphasize numerous changes that must be made without tapping into the strengths of the existing culture that support the change.
“Although it’s important to engage employees at every level early on, all successful change management initiatives start at the top, with a committed and well-aligned group of executives strongly supported by the CEO.”
It is imperative for the top team to be on the same page regarding both why the change is necessary and “the particulars for implementing it.”
The top leader or any member of the top team will dramatically undermine change efforts if they are directly or indirectly sending messages that are in conflict with the change effort. They must act in a different way that’s consistent with the change effort and visible to all.
“Mid-level and frontline people can make or break a change initiative. The path of rolling out change is immeasurably smoother if these people are tapped early for input on issues that will affect their jobs.” They highlighted that “although it may take longer in the beginning, ensuring broad involvement saves untold headaches later on.”
This is a very important principle so I wish they had also emphasized two extremely important points about this involvement.
First, the dynamics of the current culture will dramatically impact how open employees are to share their ideas and how they truly feel. It may take a number of formal and informal methods to build trust, surface ideas, and confirm ownership or buy-in to the specific improvement plans.
Secondly, don’t’ just use broad feedback methods. Do everything possible to prioritize as a team or in supporting groups. Loads of “ideas” shared in brainstorming sessions, surveys, or meetings that lead to top managers picking and choosing what to implement will not, in most cases, lead to the ownership required.
They emphasized how some businesses cover strategic business objectives like “we will enter new markets” or “we will grow 20 percent a year for the next three years” but they lack to “reach people emotionally in a way that ensures genuine commitment to the cause.”
They continued by highlighting that “human beings respond to calls to action that engage their hearts as well as their minds, making them feel as if they’re part of something consequential.”
I refer to this balance as clarifying the “why” for change efforts and making sure it’s both “logical and necessary.” The logical portion is the rational case. The “necessary” part ideally taps into the purpose and values of the organization to build that “emotional case” in a meaningful way.
Think about the live culture case study playing out with the GM ignition switch recall or the Veterans Administration Hospital scandal. These major problems are surfacing much deeper cultural issues that are rocking these organizations to their very core. The case for change and plans may be logical.
The sense of urgency and passion for acting differently in the future, no matter what new processes or procedures are implemented, will come from the emotional side of a shared purpose and values.
“Directives and incentives” will not necessarily cause a shift in behavior. It’s far more critical to ensure “people’s daily behaviors reflect the imperative of change. Start by defining a critical few behaviors that will be essential to the success of the initiative.” These new behaviors should be modeled by the top of the organization as a basis for others.
This principle is also extremely critical and I believe it’s where many change efforts go astray.
Their first principle was about leading with culture and primarily leveraging aspects of the existing culture that support the change effort. This principle builds on that point but highlights the need to be very specific about the new behaviors that are necessary to support the change effort.
Think about the GM culture crisis, what behavior must we see from GM managers to support a safe and effective environment where all employees feel comfortable proactively raising and taking ownership for resolving potential safety issues? You must be very specific about expected behaviors so the general core value or improvement area isn’t interpreted differently across the organization. It will take time and practice to ingrain the new behaviors.
“Powerful and sustained change requires constant communication, not only throughout the rollout but after the major elements of the plan are in place.”
People should be engaged at all levels and in a variety of ways (town halls, team meetings, etc.). Ongoing engagement is necessary for effective and sustainable change. I like connecting this principle back to Principle Four – “involving every layer.”
It’s not sufficient to obtain some up-front feedback on priorities, include them in your plans, and neglect to specifically define habits or systems for ongoing feedback and prioritization. It’s not about one-way communication but emphasizing two-way communication so feedback on what’s working and what’s not working about a change effort is clear and openly communicated as a basis for refining plans together as a team.
They emphasize the importance of involving and identifying “special forces.” The power of these leaders is often “more informal and is related to their expertise, to the breadth of their network, or to personal qualities that engender trust.”
I like to refer to these people as the key “influencers” or the “go to people” in organizations that people trust and navigate toward in times of change, uncertainty, or even fear.
I like to engage these informal leaders or “influencers” in two key areas beyond the definition of improvement priorities and plans where many others are involved.
First, they provide the “word” or the “buzz” about change efforts in order to understand how things are being interpreted and where adjustments are needed based on perception. They will help you to proactively expose drama, rumors, questions, and concerns.
“Influencers” should also be involved to pre-review or provide other feedback on communication efforts in order to make sure they will be received by the broader team as intended, resolve key concerns or questions, and improve overall clarity.
“Persuading people to change their behavior won’t suffice for transformation unless formal elements—such as structure, reward systems, ways of operating, training, and development—are redesigned to support them.”
I was very happy to see this principle covered. Many leaders under-estimate how many areas of their current culture and related systems are reinforcing behavior. It may be possible to gain some initial momentum without addressing these areas but the change will not be sustainable as priorities/pressures change and people come and go from the organization.
“Even when the formal elements needed for change are present, the established culture can undermine them if people revert to long-held but unconscious ways of behaving. This is why formal and informal solutions must work together.”
The “special forces” or informal leaders highlighted in principle seven should play a major part in helping to identify these informal actions.
“The Strategy&/Katzenbach Center survey revealed that many organizations involved in transformation efforts fail to measure their success before moving on.” It’s important for leaders to “take the time to find out what’s working and what’s not, and to adjust their next steps accordingly.”
Focus groups and surveys may help in this effort. I like taking the attitude that the change effort is never “done.” Projects may be completed but new issues emerge and continuous improvements are always possible when major transformations are involved.
The associated business measure(s) must improve and a new standard of behavior must be consistently exhibited based on internal and, in some cases, external feedback.
Do I really have to understand and apply all 10 Principles? Yes; learn from them, understand the insights from other experts, apply them in a connected way, and you’ll dramatically increase your chance of meaningful and sustainable change.
It’s important for change efforts to include enough fundamentals to reach the “culture tipping point” where momentum and results accelerate. Learn from the experience of others and accelerate your progress and results.
Do you agree with these principles and which one stands out to you? What’s missing and what other insights can you provide?
This post originally appeared on CultureUniversity.com